Washington County property record for 642 Hartley Rd, Millry, AL 36558
| Property Type | Single Family Home |
|---|---|
| Details | 3 ba · 1,623 sqft · built 1999 |
| Lot Size | 1 acres (43,560 sqft) |
| Owner | Individual Name on File |
| Tax Bill | $300 (2025) |
| Flood Zone | Zone X (minimal risk) |
| APN | 070419000003100100 |
| Primary APN | 070419000003100100 |
|---|
| Full Baths | 3 Baths |
|---|---|
| Stories | 1 Story |
| Building Area | 1,623 sqft Living Area |
| 1st Floor Area | 1,623 sqft |
| Flooring | Tile |
| Interior Walls | Wallboard/Drywall |
| Year Built | Built 1999 |
|---|---|
| Effective Year Built | Effective 1999 |
| Exterior Material | Aluminum/Vinyl |
| Roof Type | Gable/Hip |
| Roof Material | Shingle |
| Lot Area | 43,560 sqft (1 acres) |
| Porch | Slab |
| Porch Area | 576 sqft |
| Cooling System | HVAC |
|---|---|
| Heating System | Heat Pump |
| Street Address | 642 HARTLEY RD |
|---|---|
| City | MILLRY |
| State | AL |
| Zip | 36558-6131 |
| Property Category | Residential |
| Property Type | Residential > Single Family > Home |
| Legal Description | COM SE COR SE/4-SE/4 TH W 828 TO E R/W CHATOM & COPELAND R,D. NWLY ALG R/W 800 TO POB TH CONT NWLY 208.7 NELY 208.,7 SWLY 208 |
| Legal Range | 04W |
| Legal Township | 07N |
| Legal Section | 19 |
| Legal Subdivision | SEC19 T7N R4W |
| Jurisdiction | WASHINGTON AL |
| Township / Civil Division | MILLRY |
| Census Block Group | 2 |
| Census Block | 2022 |
| Census Tract | 43900 |
642 Hartley Rd is owned and occupied by an individual who acquired it in August 2010.
Source: Washington County records, as of April 30, 2026
| Owner of Record | Individual Name on File |
|---|---|
| Mailing Address | 642 HARTLEY RD, MILLRY, AL 36558-6131 |
| Occupancy | Owner Occupied |
| Owner Type | Individual |
Owner names and exact recorded amounts are on file and can be viewed instantly on this page with a free 10-day trial.
| Deed Names | Name on Deed |
|---|---|
| Last Sale | Aug 23, 2010 |
| Deed Sale | Aug 23, 2010 |
| Deed Book / Page | 507 / 85 |
| Record Updated | Jun 8, 2026 |
The 2025 property tax bill for 642 Hartley Rd was $300.
Source: Washington County assessment roll, as of April 30, 2026
| Type | Name |
|---|---|
| State | Alabama |
| County | Washington County |
| Unified School District | Washington County School District (KG - 12) |
| Year | Tax Bill | Assessed Value | Assessed Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $300.00 | $11,660 Land $11,660 | $116,400 Land $7,900 Building $108,500 |
| 2023 | $300.00 (+16.28%) | $11,650 (+13.99%) Land $730 Building $10,920 | $116,500 (+13.99%) Land $7,300 Building $109,200 |
| 2022 | $258.00 | $10,220 Land $730 Building $9,490 | $102,200 Land $7,300 Building $94,900 |
Assessed value and assessed market value are set for property tax purposes and are not market price estimates.
FEMA maps place 642 Hartley Rd in Zone X, an area of minimal flood risk.
Source: FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer, effective September 24, 2017 · OpenFEMA NFIP redacted claims and policies, as of September 2026
| FEMA Flood Zone | Zone X minimal risk |
|---|---|
| Flood Insurance Requirement | Not required lenders may require it |
| Nearby Flood Policies | 2 in force |
Values are read at the parcel center point; flood claims are located to the census block group, not this parcel; lenders make the official flood determination.
Wildfire risk around 642 Hartley Rd is moderate, ranking above 61% of the US, with a 0.2% annual chance of wildfire.
Source: USDA Forest Service Wildfire Risk to Communities (2nd edition), as of 2024
| Wildfire Risk | Moderate above 61% of the US · above 79% of Alabama |
|---|---|
| Wildfire Likelihood | 0.2% annual chance |
| Exposure | Direct burnable vegetation |
Values cover an area roughly 900 ft across, not the parcel itself; insurers use their own ratings.
Source: FCC Broadband Data Collection, based on 20 locations within half a mile, as of December 31, 2025
| Provider | Max Down / Up (Mbps) |
|---|---|
| Starlink Satellite | 280 / 30 |
| Millry Communications Fiber | 100 / 20 |
4G LTE (outdoors only), no 5G reported
Search by:
By searching, you agree to: Terms • Privacy • Disclosures